I_heart_VVL on 01:08:17 AM / 10-May-13Whatever happened to being able to get R12 from your friend or whatever?
It was like $90 a pound, and the car needed at least 2 and a half, plus he couldn't find a charging apparatus or a method to get the compressor oil into the system, since they no longer sell R12 premixed for car A/C.
Cajun1guy on 07:00:01 AM / 10-May-13Oh, that was caused by a previous disaster in the making, depletion of the ozone layer (remember that?) Probably from before most of you guys were born. DuPont was running out on the patent for exclusive R-12 manufacture, so something had to happen. Think of that when you hear about the "global warming" crap. Now it has to be called climate change, because the Earth is not cooperating with the farce.
Cajun, as somebody who lives in the south, where the last 15 years have been the hottest on record, each year consecutively, I'd think you'd get it, what with seeing it firsthand and all.
To say the climate isn't undergoing some kind of change is ridiculous. It obviously is. Now, what the cause of this is, I can't claim to know. But watching meteorological records since we started keeping them, there's a definite trend toward hotter warm seasons, more extreme storms in the cold seasons, and drought in new places. That's irrefutable. The question now is not whether it's happening, but what we should do about it, because it's already affecting our society and economy.
Also, CFC interaction with ozone is lab-tested, and infrared spectrography of the atmospheric ozone layer, as well as the increase in melanoma rates during the late 80s and 90s, which rose and fell with the depletion and return of the ozone layer, have very clear implications about what was causing the problem. New laws and better engineering fixed the problem, and now we don't have ozone worries anymore. I should say the same is possible for the frankly larger-scale problem of global climate change.
(Finally, the term "global warming" was accidentally coined by a climatologist, Wallace Broecker, in his 1975 book on the topic. Pundits have historically used the term far more than scientists, who have historically referred to it as "global climate change")